Shorter
women have more children. And while being on the low end of the
measuring stick benefits them on an evolutionary scale, it keeps their
brothers from attaining the trait that favors their reproductive success: average height. Researchers in the UK claim to be the first to demonstrate this new explanation for
why height variation exists: That one's height depends heavily on one's
genes, and that the genetic mechanisms for determining height are
similar in men and women, preventing each gender from being able to
evolve independently toward their sex-specific ideals.
These
same researchers have already come up with objective, if narrowly
defined, parameters for "ideal" height. The tendency to have more
children makes shorter women, in terms of reproduction, more "fit." For
men, it's not good to be too tall or too short: Even though women tend
to prefer taller men, those of average height turn out to be the most
fit.
Why
this may be so is unclear. People with these traits must to some degree
be favored by the opposite sex, although other factors, like the age at
which people of various heights tend to start having children, may also
play a role. But it is nonetheless measurable.
An average height might be the most fit as the center of the V-Bi normal curve in cooperative communities, potential mates prefer the normal height and these have the most offspring. There is however a chaotic iv-B influence pulling makes an females apart, shorter females and taller males might also do better causing an oscillation between floors and ceilings of height. This can result in women too tall or men being too short, eventually this might produce an innovation or mutation in genes so that mean can be tall whole allowing women to be short as well. This can then happen because of color interactions as both chaos and randomness find ways to express themselves in evolutionary success.
An average height might be the most fit as the center of the V-Bi normal curve in cooperative communities, potential mates prefer the normal height and these have the most offspring. There is however a chaotic iv-B influence pulling makes an females apart, shorter females and taller males might also do better causing an oscillation between floors and ceilings of height. This can result in women too tall or men being too short, eventually this might produce an innovation or mutation in genes so that mean can be tall whole allowing women to be short as well. This can then happen because of color interactions as both chaos and randomness find ways to express themselves in evolutionary success.
Using
the same people from their previous study -- a population of over
10,000 Wisconsinites who have been followed for over 50 years -- Gert
Stulp of the University of Groningen and associates looked at the
average height of the subjects and one randomly selected sibling.
Controlling for age, birth order, and total number of siblings, they
found that shorter sibling pairs had more reproductive success through
the sister, while in pairs that were average in height, the brother
tended to have more children.
This
indicates that ideal height for each gender differs significantly
enough for mixed-gender siblings to be reproductively at odds with one
another.
It
also means that "high-fitness" mothers will tend to produce
"high-fitness" daughters, to the detriment of their sons, and vice-versa
for fathers.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.